{"id":1688,"date":"2023-05-24T14:27:58","date_gmt":"2023-05-24T14:27:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/?p=1688"},"modified":"2023-05-15T14:28:20","modified_gmt":"2023-05-15T14:28:20","slug":"yargitay-karari-9","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/?p=1688","title":{"rendered":"yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesinin 09.12.2010 tarihli ve 2010\/7462 E., 2010\/20692 K. say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cT\u00fcrk Medeni Kanununun 652. maddesinde yeralan, tereke mallar\u0131 aras\u0131nda bulunan e\u015flerin birlikte ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 konutun veya ev e\u015fyas\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011f kalan e\u015fe miras hakk\u0131na mahsuben \u00f6zg\u00fclenmesi, payla\u015ft\u0131rma niteli\u011finde olup, o mal \u00fczerindeki miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n \u201celbirli\u011fi\u201d \u015feklindeki ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n izalesi sonucunu has\u0131l eder. O nedenle T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanununun 652. maddesine dayanan isteklerde g\u00f6revli mahkeme, payla\u015fma isteklerindeki g\u00f6rev kurallar\u0131na g\u00f6re belirlenmelidir. Her miras\u00e7\u0131, terekedeki belirli mallar\u0131n aynen, olanak yoksa sat\u0131\u015f yoluyla payla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmesini Sulh Mahkemesinden isteyebilir. (TMK. m. 642) Ta\u015f\u0131n\u0131r ve ta\u015f\u0131nmaz mal veya hakk\u0131n payla\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131na ve ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n giderilmesine ait davalarda Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesi g\u00f6revlidir. (HUMK. m. 8\/II-2) A\u00e7\u0131klanan yasal h\u00fck\u00fcmler kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanununun 652. maddesine dayal\u0131 \u00f6zg\u00fcleme isteklerinde g\u00f6revli mahkeme Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesidir. G\u00f6reve ili\u015fkin kurallar kamu d\u00fczeninden olup, davan\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda, ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclebilece\u011fi gibi, mahkeme de kendili\u011finden g\u00f6revli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verir. (HUMK. m. 7\/1) Ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen bu hukuki duruma g\u00f6re, \u00f6zg\u00fcleme iste\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 verilmesi gerekirken, i\u015fin esas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi do\u011fru bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Karardan da anla\u015f\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere, her miras\u00e7\u0131, terekedeki belirli mallar\u0131n aynen, olanak yoksa sat\u0131\u015f yoluyla payla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmesini Sulh Mahkemesinden isteyebilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Yarg\u0131tay Karar\u0131 &#8211; 13. HD., E. 2016\/20357 K. 2017\/3299 T. 16.3.2017 tarihli karar\u0131nda;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Davac\u0131, daval\u0131 ile\u202fdevrem\u00fclk\u202fsat\u0131\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi imzalad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, s\u00f6z konusu\u202fdevrem\u00fclk\u00fcn\u202ftapuda\u202fdevrinin yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek\u202fdevrem\u00fclk\u202fs\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin iptali, imzalad\u0131\u011f\u0131 senetler nedeniyle bor\u00e7lu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti ve \u00f6dedi\u011fi 300 tl bedelin iadesini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Daval\u0131,davan\u0131n reddini dilemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Mahkemece, davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne, karar verilmi\u015f; h\u00fck\u00fcm davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Dava,\u202fdevrem\u00fclk\u202fs\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin iptali, imzalad\u0131\u011f\u0131 senetler nedeniyle bor\u00e7lu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti ve \u00f6dedi\u011fi bedelin iadesi istemine ili\u015fkindir. Davac\u0131 kendisini vekille temsil ettirmesine ra\u011fmen davac\u0131 vekili yarar\u0131na vekalet \u00fccretine h\u00fckmedilmemi\u015ftir. Mahkemece davac\u0131 vekili yarar\u0131na Avukatl\u0131k Asgari \u00dccret Tarifesi \u00fczerinden 2.030,40 TL nispi vekalet \u00fccretine h\u00fckmedilmesi gerekirken davac\u0131 vekili yarar\u0131na vekalet \u00fccretine h\u00fckmedilmemesi usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup, bozmay\u0131 gerektirir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u015eeklinde karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Vekille temsil olunan davac\u0131ya vekalet \u00fccreti verilmesine karar vermeyen mahkemenin karar\u0131n\u0131n bozulmas\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Yarg\u0131tay Karar\u0131 &#8211; 2. HD., E. 2005\/20746 K. 2006\/5916 T. 20.4.2006 tarihli karar\u0131nda;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>1-Cinsiyetini de\u011fi\u015ftirmek isteyen kimse, \u015fahsen ba\u015fvuruda bulunarak mahkemece cinsiyet de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fine izin verilmesini isteyebilir. (TMK.40\/1)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Davac\u0131n\u0131n istemi T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunun madde 40\/1 h\u00fckm\u00fcne dayal\u0131 olarak &#8220;cinsiyet de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fine izin verilmesi davas\u0131&#8221; oldu\u011fu halde bu y\u00f6n g\u00f6zetilmeden davan\u0131n cinsiyet y\u00f6n\u00fcnden n\u00fcfus k\u00fct\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde d\u00fczeltme davas\u0131 (TMK.m.40\/2) olarak de\u011ferlendirilerek yaz\u0131l\u0131 bi\u00e7imde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>2-Kabul \u015fekli bak\u0131m\u0131ndan;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Cinsiyet de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fine izin verilebilmesi i\u00e7in davac\u0131n\u0131n transseksuel yap\u0131da olmas\u0131, \u00fcreme yetene\u011finden s\u00fcrekli bi\u00e7imde yoksun bulunmas\u0131 zorunlu olup (TMK.m.40\/1) davac\u0131n\u0131n bu niteliklere sahip olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 resmi sa\u011fl\u0131k kurulu raporu ile belirlendi\u011fi halde cinsiyet de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fine izin isteminin reddine karar verilmesi gerekti\u011finin d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmemesi de do\u011fru bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u015eeklinde karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u00dcreme yetene\u011finin s\u00fcrekli bi\u00e7imde yoksun bulunmamas\u0131 cinsiyet de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fine izin verilmesi davas\u0131n\u0131n reddedilme sebebi olmay\u0131p, Yarg\u0131tay cinsiyet de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fine izin verilmesini uygun g\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesinin 09.12.2010 tarihli ve 2010\/7462 E., 2010\/20692 K. say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131 \u201cT\u00fcrk Medeni Kanununun 652. maddesinde yeralan, tereke&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[48,58,60,45,56],"class_list":{"0":"post-1688","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-uncategorized","7":"tag-afyonavukat","8":"tag-afyonbosanmaavukati","9":"tag-afyoncezaavukati","10":"tag-avukat","11":"tag-tazminatavukati"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1688","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1688"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1688\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1689,"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1688\/revisions\/1689"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1688"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1688"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1688"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}