Hukuk Genel Kurulu 2014\/845 E. , 2015\/1741 K.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”
MAHKEMES\u0130 : Ankara 8. Aile Mahkemesi
TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 30\/01\/2014
NUMARASI : 2013\/1695-2014\/95<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki \u201c kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 bo\u015fanma\u201d davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; Ankara 8. Aile Mahkemesince as\u0131l davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile birle\u015fen davan\u0131n reddine dair verilen 13.07.2012 g\u00fcn ve 2010\/1645E, 2012\/1067 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n incelenmesinin davac\u0131-daval\u0131 koca ve daval\u0131-davac\u0131 kad\u0131n taraf\u0131ndan istenilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay 2.Hukuk Dairesinin 08.04.2013 g\u00fcn ve 2012\/22151 E, 2013\/9689 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile;
( \u20261-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 delillerle kanuna uygun sebeplere ve \u00f6zellikle delillerin takdirinde bir yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fclmemesine g\u00f6re, daval\u0131-davac\u0131 (kad\u0131n)’\u0131n t\u00fcm, davac\u0131-daval\u0131 (koca)’n\u0131n ise lehine h\u00fckmedilen tazminatlar\u0131n miktarlar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yersizdir.
2- Davac\u0131-daval\u0131 (koca)’n\u0131n di\u011fer y\u00f6nlere ili\u015fkin temyiz itirazlar\u0131na gelince:
a) Daval\u0131-davac\u0131 (kad\u0131n)’\u0131n, 05.12.2010 g\u00fcn\u00fc ortak konuta erkek ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, ayn\u0131 gece saat 22.00\u2019de evde bu ki\u015fiyle birlikte yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu \u015fahs\u0131n tuvalette gizlenmi\u015f halde bulundu\u011fu, bu olay \u00f6ncesinde de bu \u015fah\u0131sla muhtelif tarihlerde \u00e7ok say\u0131da g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesinin oldu\u011fu, yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturma ve toplanan delillerden anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Kad\u0131n\u0131n, yaln\u0131zken geceleyin bir ba\u015fka erke\u011fi ortak konuta almas\u0131, zinan\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na delalet eder. Bu bak\u0131mdan zina kan\u0131tlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Taraflar\u0131n \u201czina\u201d (TMK m. 161) sebebiyle bo\u015fanmalar\u0131na karar verilmesi gerekirken, bo\u015fanma karar\u0131n\u0131n T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanununun 166\/1. maddesine dayand\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 do\u011fru bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.
b) Taraflar\u0131n ortak \u00e7ocu\u011fu Kerem, 13.09.2007 do\u011fumlu olup, alt\u0131 ya\u015f\u0131ndad\u0131r. Yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda velayeti dava s\u00fcresince anneye b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve baba ile \u00e7ocuk aras\u0131nda ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki kuruldu\u011fu halde, annenin ki\u015fisel ili\u015fkiyi s\u00fcrekli olarak engelledi\u011fi, bu y\u00f6nde yap\u0131lan icra takibine kar\u015f\u0131n, baban\u0131n \u00e7ocu\u011funu g\u00f6remedi\u011fi dosya kapsam\u0131ndan ve icra takibine ili\u015fkin evraktan anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Baba yan\u0131nda kalmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ocu\u011fun bedeni, fikri ve ahlaki geli\u015fimine engel olaca\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde ciddi ve inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 deliller de bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen bu durum kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda velayetin davac\u0131-daval\u0131 (baba)’ya b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekirken, yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 do\u011fru bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u2026 )
gerek\u00e7esiyle karar verilerek dosya yerine geri \u00e7evrilmekle, yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
TEMY\u0130Z EDEN : Davac\u0131-daval\u0131 C\u00fcneyt Kayadan vekili
HUKUK GENEL KURULU KARARI<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Hukuk Genel Kurulunca incelenerek direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde temyiz edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve dosyadaki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunduktan sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:
As\u0131l dava zina ve evlilik birli\u011finin sars\u0131lmas\u0131 hukuksal sebebine dayal\u0131 bo\u015fanma davas\u0131, birle\u015fen dava ise evlilik birli\u011finin sars\u0131lmas\u0131 hukuksal sebebine dayal\u0131 bo\u015fanma davas\u0131d\u0131r.
Mahkemece birle\u015fen davan\u0131n reddi, as\u0131l davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile taraflar\u0131n TMK 166\/1-2 maddesi uyar\u0131nca bo\u015fanmalar\u0131na karar verilmi\u015f; taraf vekillerinin temyizi \u00fczerine karar yukar\u0131da ba\u015fl\u0131k b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde belirtilen nedenlerle bozulmu\u015f; mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.
Direnme karar\u0131n\u0131 davac\u0131-daval\u0131 koca vekili temyiz etmi\u015ftir.
Hukuk Genel Kurulunda bozma sonras\u0131 Yerel Mahkemece kurulan h\u00fckm\u00fcn ger\u00e7ekte yeni h\u00fck\u00fcm niteli\u011finde olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, temyiz incelemesinin Hukuk Genel Kurulunca m\u0131, yoksa \u00d6zel Dairece mi yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi hususu \u00f6n sorun olarak tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131p, de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.
Bilindi\u011fi \u00fczere; direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan s\u00f6z edilebilmesi i\u00e7in mahkeme, bozmadan esinlenerek yeni herhangi bir delil toplamadan \u00f6nceki deliller \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde karar vermeli, gerek\u00e7esini \u00f6nceki karar\u0131na g\u00f6re geni\u015fletebilirse de de\u011fi\u015ftirmemelidir (6217 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 30. maddesi ile 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019na eklenen \u201cGe\u00e7ici madde 3\u201d atf\u0131yla uygulanmakta olan 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun 429. maddesi). E\u015f s\u00f6yleyi\u015fle; mahkemenin yeni bir bilgi, belge ve delile dayanarak veya bozmadan esinlenip gerek\u00e7esini de\u011fi\u015ftirerek veya daha \u00f6nce \u00fczerinde durmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir hususu bozmada i\u015faret olunan \u015fekilde de\u011ferlendirerek, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla da ilk karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 hukuki olguyu de\u011fi\u015ftirerek karar vermi\u015f olmas\u0131 halinde, direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan s\u00f6z edilemez.
Somut olayda ise; Yerel Mahkemece, bozma \u00f6ncesi davac\u0131-daval\u0131 kocan\u0131n TMK 161.maddesine uyar\u0131nca zina hukuksal sebebine dayal\u0131 olarak a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 bo\u015fanma davas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda olumlu veya olumsuz bir karar verilmedi\u011fi halde bozma sonras\u0131 \u201czina nedeniyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n reddine\u201d \u015fekilde karar verilmi\u015f, \u00f6nceki kararda de\u011ferlendirilmeyen deliller de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f ve bo\u015fanma davas\u0131n\u0131n kabul gerek\u00e7esi de\u011fi\u015ftirilmi\u015ftir.
Bu durumda, mahkemenin direnme olarak adland\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 temyize konu karar\u0131n usul hukuku anlam\u0131nda ger\u00e7ek bir direnme karar\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, yeni h\u00fck\u00fcm niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu duraksamadan uzakt\u0131r.
Hal b\u00f6yle olunca; kurulan bu yeni h\u00fckm\u00fcn temyizen incelenmesi g\u00f6revi, Hukuk Genel Kuruluna de\u011fil, \u00d6zel Daireye aittir.
SONU\u00c7: Yukar\u0131da g\u00f6sterilen nedenlerle davac\u0131-daval\u0131 C\u00fcneyt Kayadan vekilinin yeni h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi i\u00e7in dosyan\u0131n 2.HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130NE G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE, 24.06.2014 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Hukuk Genel Kurulu 2014\/845 E. , 2015\/1741 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”MAHKEMES\u0130 : Ankara 8. Aile MahkemesiTAR\u0130H\u0130 : 30\/01\/2014NUMARASI : 2013\/1695-2014\/95 Taraflar…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[62],"tags":[49,48,58,45,56],"class_list":{"0":"post-1700","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-aile-hukuku","7":"tag-afyon","8":"tag-afyonavukat","9":"tag-afyonbosanmaavukati","10":"tag-avukat","11":"tag-tazminatavukati"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1700","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1700"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1700\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1701,"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1700\/revisions\/1701"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1700"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1700"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1700"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}