T.C. ANTALYA 1. ASL\u0130YE T\u0130CARET MAHKEMES\u0130 ESAS NO : 2018\/265 Esas KARAR NO : 2019\/370<\/p>\n\n\n\n
DAVA : Menfi Tespit (Kambiyo Senetlerinden Kaynaklanan)<\/p>\n\n\n\n
DAVA TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 18\/04\/2018<\/p>\n\n\n\n
KARAR TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 30\/05\/2019<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bulunan yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131k konusu yaz\u0131l\u0131 davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan a\u00e7\u0131k yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonunda:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
GERE\u011e\u0130 D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcN\u00dcLD\u00dc:
Davac\u0131 vekilinin dava dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; m\u00fcvekkilinin daval\u0131 \u2026’i emlak\u00e7\u0131 olmas\u0131 sebebi ile tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kendisinden Antalya ili Konyaalt\u0131 il\u00e7esi Hurma mahallesinde daire kiralad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda s\u00f6zle\u015fme yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kira bedelleri olarak \u00f6deme tarihi bo\u015f b\u0131rak\u0131larak senet imzaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u2026 Emlak sahibi olan \u2026’in m\u00fcvekkilinden kira bedeli olan 1.000,00 TL’yi kaparo ve bir ayl\u0131k kiray\u0131 pe\u015fin olarak ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcvekkilinin yanl\u0131z ya\u015fayan bir kad\u0131n olmas\u0131 sebebiyle evi kiralad\u0131ktan sonra m\u00fcvekkilini s\u00fcrekli taciz etti\u011fini, kendisi ile cinsel ili\u015fkiye girmeyi teklif etti\u011fini, m\u00fcvekkilinin bu isteklerine olumsuz yan\u0131t verince evinin elektri\u011fini ve suyunu kesti\u011fini, m\u00fcvekkilinin tam tarihi hat\u0131rlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve bir g\u00fcn daval\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcvekkilinin evine geldi\u011fini, imzalad\u0131\u011f\u0131 senetlerin paras\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6demesi s\u00f6yledi\u011fini, \u00f6demezse kendisiyle birlikte olmas\u0131n\u0131 yoksa Antalya’da ya\u015fatmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fini, daha sonra m\u00fcvekkilinin evini bo\u015faltt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve ta\u015f\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131 taraftan kiralad\u0131\u011f\u0131 evde 2 hafta oturabildi\u011fini, bu durum ile ilgili olarak Polis Merkezine \u015fikayet\u00e7i oldu\u011funu, daval\u0131 taraf\u0131n m\u00fcvekkiline imzalatt\u0131\u011f\u0131 senetleri Antalya \u2026 \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn \u2026 esas ve \u2026 esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyalar\u0131 ile icra takibine ge\u00e7ti\u011fini, m\u00fcvekkilinin maa\u015f\u0131na haciz koydu\u011funu, m\u00fcvekkilinin daval\u0131 tarafa herhangi bir borcu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu nedenlerle dava sonuna kadar icra takiplerinin durdurulmas\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fcvekkilinin daval\u0131ya bor\u00e7lu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespitini, daval\u0131n\u0131n haks\u0131z ve k\u00f6t\u00fc niyetli olarak yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 takip nedeniyle daval\u0131n\u0131n %20 den a\u015fa\u011f\u0131 olmamak \u00fczere k\u00f6t\u00fc niyet tazminat\u0131na h\u00fckmedilmesini, adli yard\u0131m taleplerinin kabul\u00fcn\u00fc talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir.
Daval\u0131 vekilinin cevap dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; davac\u0131 aleyhine Antalya \u2026 \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn \u2026 esas \u2026 esas say\u0131l\u0131 ile 2 adet icra takibi ba\u015flat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 2 adet icra dosyas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 tek bir davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n iddialar\u0131n\u0131n kesinlikle kabul\u00fcn\u00fcn gerekmedi\u011fini, davan\u0131n zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle reddinin gerekti\u011fini, davan\u0131n g\u00f6revsiz mahkemede a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, g\u00f6revli mahkemenin Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi oldu\u011funu, davac\u0131n\u0131n dava dilek\u00e7esinde yer alan m\u00fcvekkili aleyhine ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen iddialar\u0131 kabul etmediklerini, iddialar\u0131n\u0131n hi\u00e7bir yasal dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n tan\u0131k deliline muvafakatlar\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu nedenlerle davan\u0131n reddini talep etmi\u015ftir.
Mahkememizce Antalya \u0130l Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne m\u00fczekkere yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve cevabi yaz\u0131s\u0131 dosyam\u0131z aras\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.
DEL\u0130LLER\u0130N DE\u011eERLEND\u0130R\u0130LMES\u0130 VE GEREK\u00c7E
Dava, menfi tespit talebine ili\u015fkindir.
01.10.2011 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 6100 Say\u0131l\u0131 HMK’nun 4\/1-a maddesine g\u00f6re \u201cKiralanan ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n, 09.06.1932 tarihli ve 2004 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanununa g\u00f6re ilams\u0131z icra yoluyla tahliyesine ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmler ayr\u0131k olmak \u00fczere, kira ili\u015fkisinden do\u011fan alacak davalar\u0131 da d\u00e2hil olmak \u00fczere t\u00fcm uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131 konu alan davalar ile bu davalara kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lan davalarda\u201d Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesi g\u00f6revlidir.
Somut olayda; davac\u0131 dava dilek\u00e7esinde; daval\u0131 ile aras\u0131nda kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi bulundu\u011funu, takibe konu bonolar\u0131n kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi imzalan\u0131rken verildi\u011fini, daval\u0131n\u0131n Antalya \u2026 \u0130cra M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn \u2026 Esas ve \u2026 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyalar\u0131 ile kambiyo senetlerine mahsus haciz yolu ile icra takibi ba\u015flatt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek takibe konu bonolar nedeniyle bor\u00e7lu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespitini istemi\u015ftir.
Daval\u0131 Antalya Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u2026 soru\u015fturma say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda \u2026 tarihli Avukat\u0131 \u2026 e\u015fli\u011finde al\u0131nan ifadesinde:”\u2026ben m\u00fc\u015fteki \u2026 erkek arkada\u015f\u0131 ile birlikte evimi 1 y\u0131ll\u0131k kiralad\u0131m ve her ikisinde de kira bedellerine mahsulen burada usulen yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi senet ald\u0131m, bu senetleri al\u0131rken yan\u0131m\u0131zda tan\u0131klar vard\u0131, kendi r\u0131zalar\u0131 ile verdiler. \u0130stenirse dinletirim, tan\u0131k \u2026’d\u00fcr zaten evi de \u2026 bunlara arac\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedeniyle bunlara kiraya vermi\u015ftim. Daha sonra m\u00fc\u015fteki ve arkada\u015f\u0131 kiram\u0131 vermediler\u2026” demek suretiyle, her ne kadar ayn\u0131 daval\u0131 vekili Avukat \u2026 mahkememizin \u2026 tarihli duru\u015fmas\u0131nda taraflar aras\u0131nda kira ili\u015fkisinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmi\u015f olsa da, daval\u0131 asil taraflar aras\u0131nda kira ili\u015fkisinin bulundu\u011funu mahkeme d\u0131\u015f\u0131 olarak beyan ve ikrar etmi\u015ftir.
Hal b\u00f6yle olunca; somut olayda daval\u0131 asilin mahkeme d\u0131\u015f\u0131 olarak Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 huzurunda Avukat\u0131 e\u015fli\u011findeki beyan\u0131nda taraflar aras\u0131nda kira ili\u015fkisinin bulundu\u011funu kabul ve beyan etmesi sebebiyle uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k kira ili\u015fkisinden kaynaklananmaktad\u0131r (Ayn\u0131 y\u00f6ndeki i\u00e7tihat i\u00e7in bknz Yarg\u0131tay 6. Hukuk Dairesinin 2013\/5306 E., 2013\/14365 K. Say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131). Dava, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK’n\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmesinden sonra a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re g\u00f6revli mahkeme Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesi oldu\u011fu, g\u00f6revle ilgili d\u00fczenlemeler kamu d\u00fczenine ili\u015fkin olup, taraflar ileri s\u00fcrmese dahi yarg\u0131laman\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda re’sen g\u00f6zetilece\u011finden davan\u0131n g\u00f6rev y\u00f6n\u00fcnden dava \u015fart\u0131 yoklu\u011fu sebebiyle usulden reddine dair karar vermek gerekmi\u015f ve a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmu\u015ftur.
H\u00dcK\u00dcM: Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle;
1-Dava dilek\u00e7esinin HMK 114\/1-c ve 115\/2 maddeleri gere\u011fince dava \u015fart\u0131 yoklu\u011fu nedeniyle G\u00d6REV y\u00f6n\u00fcnden USULDEN REDD\u0130NE,
2-G\u00f6revli mahkemenin Antalya N\u00f6bet\u00e7i Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesi oldu\u011funa,
3-Karar kesinle\u015fti\u011finde ve HMK.nun 20. maddesi uyar\u0131nca kesinle\u015fme tarihinden itibaren 2 hafta i\u00e7inde mahkememize ba\u015fvurularak dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6revli mahkemeye g\u00f6nderilmesinin talep edilmesi halinde, dosyan\u0131n g\u00f6revli Antalya Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesine G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE, aksi takdirde davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f say\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilece\u011fi hususunun ihtar\u0131na,
4-Har\u00e7, yarg\u0131lama gideri ve vekalet \u00fccretinin g\u00f6revli mahkemece de\u011ferlendirilmesine,
Dair, davac\u0131 vekilinin y\u00fcz\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131, daval\u0131 vekilinin yoklu\u011funda, karar\u0131n tebli\u011fi tarihinden itibaren iki hafta i\u00e7erisinde Antalya B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinde \u0130stinaf yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere verilen karar a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a okunup, anlat\u0131ld\u0131.30\/05\/2019<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T.C. ANTALYA 1. ASL\u0130YE T\u0130CARET MAHKEMES\u0130 ESAS NO : 2018\/265 Esas KARAR NO : 2019\/370 DAVA : Menfi Tespit (Kambiyo…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[68,74],"tags":[49,48,45,43,56],"class_list":{"0":"post-1722","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-borclar-hukuku","7":"category-icra-hukuku","8":"tag-afyon","9":"tag-afyonavukat","10":"tag-avukat","11":"tag-menfi-tespit","12":"tag-tazminatavukati"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1722","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1722"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1722\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1723,"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1722\/revisions\/1723"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1722"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1722"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1722"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}