{"id":1764,"date":"2023-06-29T10:00:00","date_gmt":"2023-06-29T10:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/?p=1764"},"modified":"2023-05-17T13:32:07","modified_gmt":"2023-05-17T13:32:07","slug":"yargitay-karari-40","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/?p=1764","title":{"rendered":"yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
    \n
  1. Ceza Dairesi 2019\/2041 E. , 2019\/9200 K.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

    “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”
    MAHKEMES\u0130 :A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi
    SU\u00c7 : H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc veya tutuklular\u0131n ayaklanmas\u0131, genel g\u00fcvenli\u011fin kasten tehlikeye sokulmas\u0131
    H\u00dcK\u00dcM : Yeniden yarg\u0131lanma taleplerinin CMK.n\u0131n 323\/1 maddesi gere\u011fince reddine, \u00f6nceki h\u00fckm\u00fcn onanmas\u0131na<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:
    H\u00fckmolunan cezalar\u0131n t\u00fcr ve miktar\u0131na g\u00f6re san\u0131klar ve m\u00fcdafiilerinin duru\u015fmal\u0131 inceleme iste\u011finin 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 8\/1 maddesi uyar\u0131nca uygulanmas\u0131 gereken 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK.n\u0131n 318 maddesi uyar\u0131nca REDD\u0130NE,
    Tensiple birlikte Yarg\u0131laman\u0131n Yenilenmesi talepleri kabul edilen ve h\u00fckm\u00fc temyiz eden h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcler \u2026, \u2026, \u2026\u2026 ile Yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yenilenmesi talebinin reddine ili\u015fkin karara itiraz \u00fczerine itiraz mercii olan Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y 4. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 2014\/798 D.\u0130\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda isimleri ge\u00e7en di\u011fer h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcler hakk\u0131nda bir karar verilmemi\u015fse de bu h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcler hakk\u0131nda mahallince bir karar verilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.
    1-San\u0131k \u2026 hakk\u0131nda kurulan h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesinde;
    San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, yoklu\u011funda verilen 10.05.2016 tarihinde usul\u00fcne uygun tebli\u011f olunan h\u00fckm\u00fc, CMUK.n\u0131n 310. maddesinde belirtilen bir haftal\u0131k yasal s\u00fcreden sonra 23.05.2016 tarihinde temyiz eden san\u0131\u011f\u0131n temyiz isteminin 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 8\/1. maddesi uyar\u0131nca uygulanmas\u0131 gereken CMUK.n\u0131n 317. maddesi gere\u011fince REDD\u0130NE,
    2- San\u0131klar \u2026, \u2026, \u2026, \u2026, \u2026, \u2026, \u2026, \u2026, \u2026, \u2026, \u2026, \u2026, \u2026, \u2026, \u2026, \u2026, \u2026, \u2026, \u2026\u2026, \u2026, \u2026, \u2026, \u2026, \u2026 hakk\u0131nda kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmlere y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesinde ise;
    Yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yenilenmesinde zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 66\/5. maddesi ilk halinde \u201cAyn\u0131 fiilden dolay\u0131 her ne suretle olursa olsun tekrar yarg\u0131lanmas\u0131 gereken h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn, sonradan yarg\u0131lanan su\u00e7a ait \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131krada yaz\u0131l\u0131 esasa g\u00f6re belirecek zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurulur.\u201d \u015feklinde d\u00fczenlenmesine ra\u011fmen 29.06.2005 tarihli ve 5277 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunla \u201cAyn\u0131 fiilden dolay\u0131 tekrar yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 gerektiren hallerde, mahkemece bu husustaki talebin kabul edildi\u011fi tarihten itibaren fiile ili\u015fkin zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi yeni ba\u015ftan i\u015flemeye ba\u015flar.\u201d \u015feklinde de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fe u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fin gerek\u00e7esinin \u201cYarg\u0131laman\u0131n yenilenmesi gibi ayn\u0131 fiilden dolay\u0131 tekrar yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 gerektiren hallerde, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131k getirmeye y\u00f6nelik olarak bu f\u0131kra metninde de\u011fi\u015fiklik yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu durumlarda, dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi, tekrar yarg\u0131lama konusu su\u00e7 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan belirlenecektir. Tekrar yarg\u0131lama konusu su\u00e7a ili\u015fkin zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7 tarihi de, bu husustaki talebin mahkemece kabul edildi\u011fi tarih olacakt\u0131r. Tekrar yarg\u0131lama konusu su\u00e7a ili\u015fkin zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan, maddenin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131ndaki s\u00fcreler dikkate al\u0131nacakt\u0131r. Bu d\u00fczenlemeyle g\u00fcd\u00fclen as\u0131l ama\u00e7, yeniden yarg\u0131lama s\u00f6z konusu olan hallerde, bu nedenle dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin doldu\u011fundan bahisle yarg\u0131lamaya son verilmesi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki taleplerin \u00f6n\u00fcne ge\u00e7mektir.” \u015feklinde a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131, madde de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi ile zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n yarg\u0131laman\u0131n kabul edildi\u011fi tarihte yeni ba\u015ftan ba\u015flat\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finin ama\u00e7land\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u015fikard\u0131r. Nitekim Yarg\u0131tay 7. Ceza Dairesinin 04.05.2010 tarih ve 2006\/9001 E, 2010\/6517 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131nda da \u201cYarg\u0131laman\u0131n yenilenmesi davas\u0131nda zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 hususu g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde; h\u00fck\u00fcm kesinle\u015ftikten sonra y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK.n\u0131n 66\/5. maddesinin san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda uygulama \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bu durum kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda su\u00e7 ve kesinle\u015fme tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK.n\u0131n dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen 96-111. madde h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin birlikte de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekmektedir. Buna g\u00f6re; yarg\u0131laman\u0131n iadesi karar\u0131 \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamada asli dava geri gelmeyece\u011finden bu a\u015famada dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00f6z konusu olamaz. Kesinle\u015fmi\u015f karardan \u00f6nce ge\u00e7en zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi ile yarg\u0131laman\u0131n iadesi karar\u0131ndan sonra ge\u00e7ecek zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi birlikte de\u011ferlendirilemez. \u0130ade-i muhakeme karar\u0131 \u00fczerine mahkeme yeni delillerle \u00f6nceki delilleri birlikte de\u011ferlendirerek, sonu\u00e7ta yeni delilleri \u00f6nceki h\u00fckm\u00fcn iptalini gerektirmeyecek nitelikte g\u00f6r\u00fcrse \u00f6nceki h\u00fckm\u00fcn onanmas\u0131na karar vermekle y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr. \u00d6nceki h\u00fck\u00fcm iptal edilmez de onan\u0131rsa zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcm bozulamaz. Buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k ister lehe isterse aleyhe olsun iade-i muhakeme karar\u0131 \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda eski h\u00fck\u00fcm iptal olunur ve belirlenecek yeni duruma g\u00f6re, bir mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc kurmak gerekirse belirlenen yeni durumun gerektirdi\u011fi zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nacak ve ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131 da su\u00e7 tarihi kabul edilecektir. Ancak, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n iadesi karar\u0131 ile \u00f6nceki mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc iptal olunur ve yeni duruma g\u00f6re beraat karar\u0131 vermek gerekirse zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00f6z konusu olamaz. Bu durumda beraat karar\u0131 verilmelidir. (Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ceza Dairesinin 8.12.1999 g\u00fcn, 1999\/3547-4139 karar\u0131 da ayn\u0131 y\u00f6ndedir.) Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda incelenen dosyaya d\u00f6n\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde; Mahkemece iade-i muhakeme karar\u0131 verildikten sonra yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda, ya yeni delillerle birlikte eski deliller de\u011ferlendirilerek \u00f6nceki h\u00fckm\u00fcn onanmas\u0131na ya da yeni delillerle birlikte durumun de\u011fi\u015fti\u011finin kabul edilmesi halinde h\u00fckm\u00fcn iptali ile yeni duruma g\u00f6re bir karar verilmesi gerekirken zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 doldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esi ile \u00f6nceki h\u00fckm\u00fcn iptaline karar verilmesi\u201d \u015feklinde karar vermi\u015ftir. Bu kararda da belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yenilenmesinde zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin, kesinle\u015fmi\u015f karardan \u00f6nce i\u015fleyen zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi ile yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yenilenmesi talebinin kabul\u00fc karar\u0131ndan sonra i\u015fleyecek zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi birlikte de\u011ferlendirilemeyece\u011fi, mahkemenin, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yenilenmesi talebinin kabule de\u011fer oldu\u011funa karar verdi\u011fi andan itibaren yeni ba\u015ftan ba\u015flayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcnde zorunluluk bulunmaktad\u0131r.
    Yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yenilenmesi talebinin kabule \u015fayan g\u00f6r\u00fclmesinin nedeni, tan\u0131k \u2026\u2019\u00fcn beyanlar\u0131na ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131nda gereklilik g\u00f6r\u00fclmesidir. Mahkemece yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda, bu tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n san\u0131klar\u0131n hukuki durumlar\u0131nda bir de\u011fi\u015fiklik yaratmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanaatiyle eski h\u00fck\u00fcmler y\u00f6n\u00fcnden \u201conaylanma\u201d karar\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir. Kesinle\u015fen davan\u0131n iddianamesinde bu tan\u0131ktan bahsedilmi\u015f, yerel mahkeme bu ki\u015fiyi dinlenmesine gerek g\u00f6rmemi\u015f, Yarg\u0131tay ise bu haliyle h\u00fckm\u00fc onam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu tespitler kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan yeni delilin etkilemedi\u011fi hukuki durumlarda da tart\u0131\u015fma yap\u0131lmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik taleplerinin kabul\u00fc m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. Sonradan ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan kan\u0131t\u0131n sonucu de\u011fi\u015ftirmemesi nedeniyle onaylanmas\u0131na karar verilen kesinle\u015fmi\u015f mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcndeki hatal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclen kabul ve hukuki de\u011ferlendirmelerin yarg\u0131lanman\u0131n yenilenmesi konusu yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131, ancak CMK.n\u0131n 308. maddesine g\u00f6re Yarg\u0131tay 4. Ceza Dairesinin 30.11.2011 tarihli onama, d\u00fczeltilerek onama ve bozma karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca lehe itiraz yoluna ba\u015fvurulabilece\u011fi ortadad\u0131r. Bu de\u011ferlendirme ve s\u0131n\u0131rlama sonucunda Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bu taleplerinin, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yenilenmesi kapsam\u0131nda ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclemeyece\u011fi cihetle, tebli\u011fnamedeki bu hususlara ili\u015fkin bozma d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesine i\u015ftirak edilmemi\u015ftir.
    Yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamaya, dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fine, sonradan toplan\u0131p karar yerinde g\u00f6sterilen ve de\u011ferlendirilen delile, hukuka uygun, yasal ve yeterli olarak a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7eye g\u00f6re san\u0131klar ve m\u00fcdafilerinin s\u00fcbuta ve lehe h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin uygulanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fine y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011finden reddiyle h\u00fckm\u00fcn ONANMASINA, 01.07.2019 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”MAHKEMES\u0130 :A\u011f\u0131r Ceza MahkemesiSU\u00c7 : H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc veya tutuklular\u0131n ayaklanmas\u0131, genel g\u00fcvenli\u011fin kasten tehlikeye sokulmas\u0131H\u00dcK\u00dcM : Yeniden yarg\u0131lanma taleplerinin CMK.n\u0131n…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[73],"tags":[49,48,60,61,45],"class_list":{"0":"post-1764","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-ceza-hukuku","7":"tag-afyon","8":"tag-afyonavukat","9":"tag-afyoncezaavukati","10":"tag-afyontazminatavukati","11":"tag-avukat"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1764","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1764"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1764\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1765,"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1764\/revisions\/1765"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1764"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1764"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1764"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}