{"id":1778,"date":"2023-07-06T10:00:00","date_gmt":"2023-07-06T10:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/?p=1778"},"modified":"2023-05-17T13:41:39","modified_gmt":"2023-05-17T13:41:39","slug":"yargitay-karari-47","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/?p=1778","title":{"rendered":"yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\" start=\"11\">\n<li>Hukuk Dairesi 2015\/1083 E. , 2015\/6268 K.<br>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<br>MAHKEMES\u0130 : ASL\u0130YE T\u0130CARET MAHKEMES\u0130<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p>Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen davada \u2026 Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesi\u2019nce bozmaya uyularak verilen 22\/10\/2014 tarih ve 2014\/1031-2014\/314 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n Yarg\u0131tayca incelenmesi daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenmi\u015f ve temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmakla, dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten ve yine dosya i\u00e7erisindeki dilek\u00e7e, layihalar, duru\u015fma tutanaklar\u0131 ve t\u00fcm belgeler okunup, incelendikten sonra i\u015fin gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp, d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<br>Davac\u0131 vekili, m\u00fcvekkilinin sigorta ve reas\u00fcrans brokeri olup daval\u0131 ile s\u00f6zle\u015fme imzalad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, s\u00f6zle\u015fme gere\u011fi dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u2026. Kimya Sanayi ve Ticaret A.\u015e.&#8217;nin daval\u0131dan poli\u00e7e almas\u0131na arac\u0131l\u0131k etti\u011fini, poli\u00e7e kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda m\u00fcvekkilinin lehtar oldu\u011fu iki adet \u00e7eki daval\u0131 sigorta \u015firketine vermesi i\u00e7in m\u00fcvekkiline teslim etti\u011fini, m\u00fcvekkilinin de ciro ile \u00e7ekleri daval\u0131ya teslim etti\u011fini, dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u015firketin iflas etmesi nedeniyle daval\u0131n\u0131n ciroya dayanarak m\u00fcvekkili hakk\u0131nda icra takibi yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ancak dava konusu borcun dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u015firketin daval\u0131ya olan prim borcu oldu\u011funu, taraflar aras\u0131ndaki protokole g\u00f6re m\u00fcvekkilinin prim bor\u00e7lar\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 sorumlulu\u011funun ve temel ili\u015fkiye g\u00f6re m\u00fcvekkilinin daval\u0131ya bir borcunun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek, m\u00fcvekkili hakk\u0131nda yap\u0131lan icra takip miktar\u0131 45.649.60 TL bor\u00e7lu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespitini istemi\u015f, dava devam ederken icra takibi nedeniyle \u00f6deme yapmak zorunda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek \u00f6dedi\u011fi 54.234 TL&#8217;nin istirdad\u0131n\u0131 talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir.<br>Daval\u0131 vekili, m\u00fcvekkili ile davac\u0131 aras\u0131nda yap\u0131lan protokol gere\u011fi davac\u0131n\u0131n poli\u00e7elerin prim tahsilatlar\u0131n\u0131 yapma hakk\u0131 oldu\u011fu, komisyon \u00fccreti d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fckten sonra kalan k\u0131sm\u0131n m\u00fcvekkiline \u00f6dendi\u011fini, dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u2026 Kimya ve Sanayi Ticaret A.\u015e.&#8217;den primleri \u00e7ek ile tahsil etti\u011fini, cirantan\u0131n da ke\u015fideci ile beraber sorumlulu\u011funun bulundu\u011funu savunarak, davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir.<br>Mahkemece, iddia, savunma, uyulan bozma ilam\u0131 ve dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re; daha \u00f6ncesinde verilen karar\u0131n \u201cdavac\u0131 icra takibinde haks\u0131z ise de ciro silsilesi ile me\u015fru hamil oldu\u011fu \u00e7eki takibe koymakta k\u00f6t\u00fc niyetli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, taraflar aras\u0131ndaki s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin yorumlanmas\u0131 neticesinde daval\u0131n\u0131n haks\u0131z oldu\u011fu sonucuna var\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, daval\u0131n\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fc niyetinin ispatlanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu nedenle k\u00f6t\u00fc niyet tazminat\u0131na h\u00fckmedilemeyece\u011fi\u201d belirtilerek bozuldu\u011fu, bozma kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan hususlar\u0131n kesinle\u015fti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle davac\u0131n\u0131n\u2026 M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc&#8217;n\u00fcn 2009\/26093 Esas say\u0131l\u0131 icra dosyas\u0131nda bor\u00e7lu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti ile 54.234,00 TL&#8217;nin 28.8.2009 tarihinden itibaren i\u015fleyecek avans faizi ile birlikte davac\u0131dan tahsiline ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcm kesinle\u015fmi\u015f olmakla bu hususta yeniden karar verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, davac\u0131n\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fc niyet tazminat\u0131na y\u00f6nelik talebin reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<br>Karar\u0131, daval\u0131 vekili temyiz etmi\u015ftir.<br>Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, mahkemece uyulan bozma karar\u0131 gere\u011fince h\u00fck\u00fcm verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131na ve delillerin takdirinde bir isabetsizlik bulunmamas\u0131na g\u00f6re, daval\u0131 vekilinin b\u00fct\u00fcn temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde de\u011fildir.<br>SONU\u00c7: Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerden dolay\u0131, daval\u0131 vekilinin b\u00fct\u00fcn temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddiyle usul ve kanuna uygun bulunan h\u00fckm\u00fcn ONANMASINA, a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 bakiye 2.778,00 TL temyiz ilam harc\u0131n\u0131n temyiz edenden al\u0131nmas\u0131na, 04\/05\/2015 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen davada \u2026 Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesi\u2019nce bozmaya uyularak verilen 22\/10\/2014 tarih ve 2014\/1031-2014\/314 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n Yarg\u0131tayca incelenmesi daval\u0131&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[68,71,69],"tags":[49,48,61,45,43,56],"class_list":{"0":"post-1778","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-borclar-hukuku","7":"category-sirketler-hukuku","8":"category-tazminat-hukuku","9":"tag-afyon","10":"tag-afyonavukat","11":"tag-afyontazminatavukati","12":"tag-avukat","13":"tag-menfi-tespit","14":"tag-tazminatavukati"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1778","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1778"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1778\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1779,"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1778\/revisions\/1779"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1778"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1778"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tepekaya.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1778"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}